PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTDR vs. NOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTDR vs. NOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTDR achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly higher than NOG's 2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MTDR has outperformed NOG with an annualized return of 10.83%, while NOG has yielded a comparatively lower -2.51% annualized return.


MTDR

1D
3.27%
1M
1.73%
6M
11.87%
YTD
19.25%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
-1.84%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
10.83%
ALL TIME*
11.10%

NOG

1D
1.49%
1M
20.44%
6M
-12.08%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
-18.99%
3Y*
-13.95%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
-2.51%
ALL TIME*
-2.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$116.12M$98.02M$97.95M
$54.84M$61.54M$65.18M

MTDR vs. NOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
19.25%-22.31%0.37%0.57%55.83%207.33%-32.89%15.71%-50.11%20.85%
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
2.37%-38.20%4.84%25.54%54.51%136.72%-62.56%3.54%10.24%-25.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MTDR and NOG is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.63

Over the past year, MTDR and NOG have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTDR:

$6.20B

NOG:

$2.30B

EPS

MTDR:

$3.89

NOG:

-$6.34

PS Ratio

MTDR:

1.84

NOG:

1.37

PB Ratio

MTDR:

1.10

NOG:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTDR:

$3.36B

NOG:

$1.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTDR:

$3.43B

NOG:

$450.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTDR:

$1.97B

NOG:

$73.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTDR vs. NOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTDR
MTDR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MTDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTDR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MTDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTDR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

NOG
NOG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTDR vs. NOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matador Resources Company (MTDR) and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTDRNOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.96

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

-0.46

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.22

-1.03

+1.25

MTDR vs. NOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the NOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTDR and NOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTDR vs. NOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTDR drawdown since its inception was -96.50%, roughly equal to the maximum NOG drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTDR and NOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTDRNOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.50%

-98.96%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.06%

-41.43%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.83%

-55.08%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.29%

-55.08%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.50%

-92.15%

-4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.94%

-91.84%

+64.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.07%

-69.89%

+44.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.24%

19.41%

-5.17%

Volatility

MTDR vs. NOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is 14.32%, while Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) has a volatility of 16.52%. This indicates that MTDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTDRNOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.32%

16.52%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.69%

33.58%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.65%

46.31%

-4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.85%

49.16%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.89%

70.52%

-5.63%

Dividends

MTDR vs. NOG - Dividend Comparison

MTDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than NOG's 8.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
2.88%3.09%1.51%1.14%0.52%0.34%
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
8.51%8.38%4.41%4.02%2.86%0.75%

Financials

MTDR vs. NOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Matador Resources Company and Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MTDR and NOG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOG has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to MTDR (14.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTDR dropped -96.50% vs NOG's -98.96%.

MTDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTDR and NOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer