MTD vs. PG
MTD (Mettler-Toledo International Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. MTD operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MTD returned 11.73%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTD vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTD achieves a -18.84% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MTD has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 11.73%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
MTD
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- -18.84%
- 6M
- -18.81%
- 1Y
- -2.07%
- 3Y*
- -4.98%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -3.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
MTD vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | -18.84% | 13.93% | 0.88% | -16.08% | -14.83% | 48.92% | 43.67% | 40.26% | -8.71% | 48.01% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTD and PG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 1997 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
MTD:
$22.95B
PG:
$361.53B
MTD:
$42.68
PG:
$5.23
MTD:
26.51
PG:
28.63
MTD:
4.07
PG:
7.00
MTD:
5.67
PG:
4.20
MTD:
6.26
PG:
6.70
MTD:
$4.09B
PG:
$86.72B
MTD:
$2.36B
PG:
$43.64B
MTD:
$1.24B
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTD vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
MTD
PG
MTD vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTD | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | -0.37 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -0.68 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTD vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTD drawdown since its inception was -61.43%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTD and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTD | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.43% | -54.25% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.90% | -15.52% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -21.15% | -15.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.47% | -23.77% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | -23.77% | -19.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.54% | -13.29% | -20.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -12.16% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 8.80% | +2.68% |
Volatility
MTD vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that MTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTD | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.92% | 6.99% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.16% | 15.01% | +11.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.17% | 18.78% | +13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.15% | 17.82% | +14.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 19.05% | +10.73% |
Dividends
MTD vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
MTD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
MTD vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTD vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
MTD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a gross profit of 555.82M and revenue of 947.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.7%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
MTD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported an operating income of 246.22M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
MTD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a net income of 169.45M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTD and PG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTD has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTD dropped -61.43% vs PG's -54.25%.
MTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTD and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer