MTD vs. MRSH
MTD (Mettler-Toledo International Inc.) and MRSH (Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc) are both stocks. MTD operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while MRSH operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, MTD returned 11.73%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for MRSH. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTD vs. MRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTD achieves a -18.84% return, which is significantly lower than MRSH's -8.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MTD having a 11.73% annualized return and MRSH not far ahead at 11.75%.
MTD
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- -18.84%
- 6M
- -18.81%
- 1Y
- -2.07%
- 3Y*
- -4.98%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
MRSH
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- -8.15%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- -20.92%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
MTD vs. MRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | -18.84% | 13.93% | 0.88% | -16.08% | -14.83% | 48.92% | 43.67% | 40.26% | -8.71% | 48.01% |
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | -8.15% | -11.26% | 13.75% | 16.15% | -3.45% | 50.83% | 6.86% | 42.33% | -0.14% | 22.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTD and MRSH is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 1997 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTD and MRSH has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MTD:
$22.95B
MRSH:
$81.98B
MTD:
$42.68
MRSH:
$7.99
MTD:
26.51
MRSH:
21.11
MTD:
4.07
MRSH:
2.46
MTD:
5.67
MRSH:
3.01
MTD:
6.26
MRSH:
5.54
MTD:
$4.09B
MRSH:
$27.52B
MTD:
$2.36B
MRSH:
$11.66B
MTD:
$1.24B
MRSH:
$6.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTD vs. MRSH — Risk / Return Rank
MTD
MRSH
MTD vs. MRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTD | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.85 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | -0.80 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -1.40 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTD vs. MRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTD drawdown since its inception was -61.43%, smaller than the maximum MRSH drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTD and MRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTD | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.43% | -67.46% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.90% | -27.01% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -34.36% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.47% | -34.36% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | -35.80% | -7.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.54% | -29.62% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -17.41% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 15.50% | -4.02% |
Volatility
MTD vs. MRSH - Volatility Comparison
Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) at 6.91%. This indicates that MTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTD | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.92% | 6.91% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.16% | 19.10% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.17% | 23.47% | +8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.15% | 20.20% | +11.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 20.94% | +8.84% |
Dividends
MTD vs. MRSH - Dividend Comparison
MTD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | 2.13% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% |
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MTD vs. MRSH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTD vs. MRSH - Profitability Comparison
MTD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a gross profit of 555.82M and revenue of 947.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.7%.
MRSH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 7.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
MTD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported an operating income of 246.22M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
MRSH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
MTD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a net income of 169.45M and revenue of 947.13M, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
MRSH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTD and MRSH have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTD has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to MRSH (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTD dropped -61.43% vs MRSH's -67.46%.
MTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTD and MRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer