PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTCIX vs. MMUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTCIX achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than MMUFX's 6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MTCIX has outperformed MMUFX with an annualized return of 21.12%, while MMUFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.


MTCIX

1D
0.73%
1M
-1.32%
6M
13.49%
YTD
13.40%
1Y
25.35%
3Y*
32.15%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
21.12%
ALL TIME*
10.77%

MMUFX

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.90%
6M
5.32%
YTD
6.09%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
8.40%
ALL TIME*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTCIX
MFS Technology Fund
13.40%16.39%56.76%54.42%-36.18%14.11%46.45%38.84%1.85%38.78%
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
6.09%14.32%11.38%-2.28%0.35%13.86%6.04%24.91%0.85%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MTCIX and MMUFX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between MTCIX and MMUFX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTCIX vs. MMUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTCIX
MTCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MTCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MTCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MMUFX
MMUFX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MMUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MMUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTCIXMMUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

2.66

+0.96

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the MMUFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTCIX and MMUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTCIX drawdown since its inception was -82.78%, which is greater than MMUFX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTCIX and MMUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTCIXMMUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.78%

-56.03%

-26.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.59%

-8.75%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.97%

-14.52%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.74%

-21.64%

-21.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

-35.82%

-6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-6.01%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-8.73%

-20.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

3.76%

+2.38%

Volatility

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) at 4.48%. This indicates that MTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTCIXMMUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

4.48%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.57%

11.91%

+7.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.67%

14.68%

+8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.94%

15.90%

+10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.30%

16.63%

+7.67%

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTCIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than MMUFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTCIX vs. MMUFX - Dividend Comparison

MTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.09%, more than MMUFX's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
3.48%3.83%3.72%5.82%8.68%5.61%5.80%6.85%4.29%2.67%3.72%9.09%
MTCIX
MFS Technology Fund
12.09%13.71%26.78%9.66%10.35%11.58%4.97%3.87%4.97%3.51%1.84%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTCIX and MMUFX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTCIX has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to MMUFX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTCIX dropped -82.78% vs MMUFX's -56.03%.

MTCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTCIX and MMUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer