PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMUFX vs. VFIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMUFX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than VFIAX's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MMUFX has underperformed VFIAX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while VFIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.76% annualized return.


MMUFX

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
7.13%
6M
7.39%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
8.95%

VFIAX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.77%
6M
8.77%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
15.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
7.13%14.32%11.38%-2.28%0.35%13.86%6.04%24.91%0.85%14.69%
VFIAX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares
9.77%17.83%24.97%26.24%-18.16%28.65%18.32%31.46%-4.45%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MMUFX and VFIAX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2000

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between MMUFX and VFIAX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMUFX vs. VFIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMUFX
MMUFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MMUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MMUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VFIAX
VFIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VFIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VFIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMUFXVFIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.01

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

13.60

-8.78

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMUFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the VFIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMUFX and VFIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMUFX drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VFIAX drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMUFX and VFIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMUFXVFIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

-55.20%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-8.90%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-18.75%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-24.53%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-33.83%

-1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.09%

-1.72%

-3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-9.38%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.97%

+1.59%

Volatility

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares (VFIAX) at 4.67%. This indicates that MMUFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMUFXVFIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.67%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

9.84%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

12.50%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

16.99%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

18.11%

-1.47%

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMUFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VFIAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMUFX vs. VFIAX - Dividend Comparison

MMUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than VFIAX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
3.57%3.83%3.72%5.82%8.68%5.61%5.80%6.85%4.29%2.67%3.72%9.09%
VFIAX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.03%1.12%1.24%1.45%1.68%1.24%1.53%1.87%2.05%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMUFX and VFIAX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMUFX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VFIAX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMUFX dropped -56.03% vs VFIAX's -55.20%.

VFIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMUFX and VFIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer