PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTCIX vs. MGIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund (MGIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTCIX achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than MGIAX's 6.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MTCIX has outperformed MGIAX with an annualized return of 22.41%, while MGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.98% annualized return.


MTCIX

1D
2.28%
1M
13.72%
YTD
21.56%
6M
20.07%
1Y
43.38%
3Y*
38.46%
5Y*
19.11%
10Y*
22.41%

MGIAX

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.95%
YTD
6.47%
6M
8.70%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTCIX
MFS Technology Fund
21.56%16.39%56.76%54.42%-36.18%14.11%46.45%38.84%1.85%38.78%
MGIAX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund
6.47%32.75%7.07%17.76%-23.24%10.25%20.16%25.57%-9.22%26.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MTCIX and MGIAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.58

The correlation between MTCIX and MGIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTCIX vs. MGIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTCIX
MTCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MTCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MTCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MGIAX
MGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund (MGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTCIXMGIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.52

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.84

2.18

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.68

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.97

6.07

+1.90

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the MGIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTCIX and MGIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTCIXMGIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.52

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.46

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.64

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Drawdowns

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTCIX drawdown since its inception was -82.78%, which is greater than MGIAX's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTCIX and MGIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTCIXMGIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.78%

-51.94%

-30.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.59%

-12.43%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.97%

-13.57%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.74%

-37.13%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

-37.13%

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.99%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.86%

-8.63%

-21.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

3.45%

+2.17%

Volatility

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund (MGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that MTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTCIXMGIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.05%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

10.96%

+5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.47%

13.88%

+6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.42%

16.69%

+8.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

15.65%

+8.41%

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTCIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than MGIAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTCIX vs. MGIAX - Dividend Comparison

MTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, more than MGIAX's 7.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGIAX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund
7.78%8.28%12.79%11.81%14.57%7.59%5.30%3.89%4.41%2.48%1.62%3.10%
MTCIX
MFS Technology Fund
11.28%13.71%26.78%9.66%10.35%11.58%4.97%3.87%4.97%3.51%1.84%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTCIX and MGIAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTCIX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to MGIAX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTCIX dropped -82.78% vs MGIAX's -51.94%.

MTCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTCIX and MGIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer