PortfoliosLab logo
MMUFX vs. FLCSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MMUFX and FLCSX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MMUFX vs. FLCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MMUFX:

11.54%

FLCSX:

19.53%

Max Drawdown

MMUFX:

-0.68%

FLCSX:

-63.67%

Current Drawdown

MMUFX:

-0.43%

FLCSX:

-5.96%

Returns By Period


MMUFX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FLCSX

YTD

0.13%

1M

8.36%

6M

-2.44%

1Y

11.46%

5Y*

19.78%

10Y*

11.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMUFX vs. FLCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMUFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCSX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMUFX vs. FLCSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMUFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMUFX is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMUFX is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMUFX is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMUFX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMUFX is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMUFX is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLCSX is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLCSX is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLCSX is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLCSX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLCSX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLCSX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MMUFX vs. FLCSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

MMUFX vs. FLCSX - Dividend Comparison

MMUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than FLCSX's 4.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
3.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
4.25%4.26%2.83%3.07%4.71%3.93%5.43%13.75%3.48%3.61%4.93%6.04%

Drawdowns

MMUFX vs. FLCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMUFX drawdown since its inception was -0.68%, smaller than the maximum FLCSX drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMUFX and FLCSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MMUFX vs. FLCSX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...