MTBA vs. SVOL
MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) and SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify, while SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MTBA returned 5.18% vs 10.62% for SVOL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTBA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SVOL.
Performance
MTBA vs. SVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than SVOL's -0.40% return.
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVOL
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA vs. SVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.23% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | -0.40% | 2.41% | 6.77% | 3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTBA and SVOL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.22 |
MTBA vs. SVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTBA
SVOL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
MTBA
SVOL
Basic Materials
MTBA
-
SVOL
Communication Services
MTBA
-
SVOL
Consumer Cyclical
MTBA
-
SVOL
Consumer Defensive
MTBA
-
SVOL
Energy
MTBA
-
SVOL
Healthcare
MTBA
-
SVOL
Industrials
MTBA
-
SVOL
Real Estate
MTBA
-
SVOL
Technology
MTBA
-
SVOL
Utilities
MTBA
-
SVOL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTBA vs. SVOL — Risk / Return Rank
MTBA
SVOL
MTBA vs. SVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTBA | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.12 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.82 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 1.94 | +4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTBA | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 0.51 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.35 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
MTBA vs. SVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum SVOL drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and SVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTBA | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -33.50% | +30.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -13.01% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -2.98% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -4.77% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 5.49% | -4.66% |
Volatility
MTBA vs. SVOL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 1.33%, while Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTBA | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 1.41% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | 9.57% | -7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10% | 20.90% | -17.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 21.99% | -18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 21.92% | -17.97% |
MTBA vs. SVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SVOL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTBA vs. SVOL - Dividend Comparison
MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, less than SVOL's 22.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.09% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | 22.10% | 19.82% | 16.79% | 16.36% | 18.32% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTBA and SVOL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVOL has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to MTBA (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTBA dropped -3.48% vs SVOL's -33.50%.
On 1-year performance, SVOL leads with 10.62% vs 5.18% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SVOL has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SVOL.
SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.10%, compared with 6.09% for MTBA.
MTBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while SVOL is Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTBA and 0.50% for SVOL.
MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTBA and SVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer