MTBA vs. PFIX
MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) and PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify, while PFIX is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MTBA returned 5.18% vs -15.57% for PFIX. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. MTBA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PFIX.
Performance
MTBA vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's -2.55% return.
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- -15.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.23% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | -2.55% | 0.42% | 35.94% | -22.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTBA and PFIX is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | -0.72 |
The correlation between MTBA and PFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.72 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
MTBA vs. PFIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTBA
PFIX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MTBA
PFIX
Basic Materials
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Communication Services
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Consumer Cyclical
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Consumer Defensive
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Energy
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Healthcare
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Industrials
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Real Estate
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Technology
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Utilities
MTBA
-
PFIX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTBA vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MTBA
PFIX
MTBA vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTBA | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.93 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | -0.61 | +2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | -0.96 | +7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTBA | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | -0.52 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.39 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
MTBA vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and PFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTBA | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -36.17% | +32.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -25.64% | +22.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -19.65% | +18.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -17.13% | +16.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 16.35% | -15.52% |
Volatility
MTBA vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 1.33%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTBA | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 7.51% | -6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | 20.89% | -18.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10% | 30.32% | -27.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 38.50% | -34.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 38.35% | -34.40% |
MTBA vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTBA vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison
MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, less than PFIX's 9.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.09% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 9.96% | 9.92% | 3.40% | 87.92% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTBA and PFIX have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIX has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to MTBA (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTBA dropped -3.48% vs PFIX's -36.17%.
On 1-year performance, MTBA leads with 5.18% vs -15.57% for PFIX. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MTBA has performed better with a 5.18% return vs -15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PFIX.
PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 9.96%, compared with 6.09% for MTBA.
MTBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while PFIX is Hedge Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTBA and 0.50% for PFIX.
MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTBA and PFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer