MTBA vs. EVMO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) and EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTBA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EVMO.

Performance

MTBA vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than EVMO's 0.71% return.

MTBA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EVMO

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTBA vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	-0.06%	3.26%
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF	0.71%	3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MTBA and EVMO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

MTBA vs. EVMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTBA

MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 39
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 34

EVMO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTBA vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTBA	EVMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.96	—	—

Drawdowns

MTBA vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, which is greater than EVMO's maximum drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and EVMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTBA	EVMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-1.89%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.93%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-0.42%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MTBA	EVMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10%	2.86%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.95%	2.86%	+1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.95%	2.86%	+1.09%

MTBA vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTBA vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison

MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than EVMO's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF	4.07%	1.95%	0.00%	0.00%
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	6.08%	5.98%	6.03%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTBA and EVMO in my portfolio?

MTBA and EVMO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MTBA or EVMO?

On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTBA or EVMO?

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EVMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTBA or EVMO?

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 4.07% for EVMO.

What is the main difference between MTBA and EVMO?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTBA and 0.45% for EVMO.