MSTZ vs. ZIVB
MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. MSTZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
MSTZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 35.97% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTZ vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank
MSTZ
ZIVB
MSTZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MSTZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | 0.00% | -99.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | 0.00% | -98.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | 0.00% | -94.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.30% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTZ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 125.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.34% | 0.00% | +140.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 0.00% | +170.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 0.00% | +170.37% |
MSTZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTZ nor ZIVB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
MSTZ and ZIVB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for MSTZ and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer