MSTZ vs. YQQQ
MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) and YQQQ (YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX, while YQQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTZ returned 94.24% vs -14.25% for YQQQ. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for YQQQ.
Performance
MSTZ vs. YQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -46.88% return, which is significantly lower than YQQQ's -8.94% return.
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YQQQ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- -8.94%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- -14.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ vs. YQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.88% | -38.95% | -94.26% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.94% | -9.97% | -3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTZ and YQQQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTZ vs. YQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MSTZ
YQQQ
MSTZ vs. YQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTZ | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.83 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.69 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | -1.68 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTZ | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | -1.14 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | -0.77 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
MSTZ vs. YQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than YQQQ's maximum drawdown of -28.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and YQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTZ | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | -28.21% | -71.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -20.82% | -64.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | -28.17% | -69.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -14.22% | -80.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.30% | 8.52% | +31.78% |
Volatility
MSTZ vs. YQQQ - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 37.49% compared to YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) at 3.90%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTZ | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.49% | 3.90% | +33.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 125.82% | 9.87% | +115.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.34% | 12.51% | +127.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 16.26% | +154.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 16.26% | +154.11% |
MSTZ vs. YQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than YQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTZ vs. YQQQ - Dividend Comparison
MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | 31.75% | 31.71% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTZ and YQQQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.49%) compared to YQQQ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.36% vs YQQQ's -28.21%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 94.24% vs -14.25% for YQQQ. On fees, YQQQ is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 94.24% return vs -14.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YQQQ is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 31.75%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
MSTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YQQQ is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 0.99% for YQQQ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTZ and YQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer