PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTZ vs. ORCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -31.95% return, which is significantly lower than ORCS's 24.83% return.


MSTZ

1D
-0.09%
1M
46.79%
6M
0.09%
YTD
-31.95%
1Y
252.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ORCS

1D
-3.32%
1M
42.86%
6M
24.76%
YTD
24.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-31.95%61.95%
ORCS
Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF
24.83%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTZ and ORCS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTZ vs. ORCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ORCS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTZORCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than ORCS's maximum drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and ORCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTZORCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.38%

-50.25%

-49.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.68%

-10.69%

-86.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.55%

-16.32%

-78.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.81%

Volatility

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTZORCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

56.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

135.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.51%

59.71%

+88.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

170.85%

59.71%

+111.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

170.85%

59.71%

+111.14%

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ORCS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTZ vs. ORCS - Dividend Comparison

MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ORCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSTZ and ORCS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ORCS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ORCS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

ORCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 0.97% for ORCS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTZ and ORCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer