PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTZ vs. BRKD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -46.88% return, which is significantly lower than BRKD's 5.90% return.


MSTZ

1D
14.02%
1M
86.49%
YTD
-46.88%
6M
-23.06%
1Y
94.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRKD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.90%
6M
6.63%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-46.88%-38.95%66.96%
BRKD
Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares
5.90%-6.69%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTZ and BRKD is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

-0.02

The correlation between MSTZ and BRKD shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTZ vs. BRKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BRKD
BRKD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BRKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRKD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BRKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTZBRKDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

0.60

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.00

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.12

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

0.86

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.35

1.67

+0.67

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the BRKD Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTZ and BRKD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTZBRKDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

0.60

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

0.04

-0.57

Drawdowns

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than BRKD's maximum drawdown of -17.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and BRKD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTZBRKDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-17.92%

-81.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-9.34%

-75.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.14%

-3.69%

-94.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-7.74%

-86.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.30%

4.78%

+35.52%

Volatility

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 37.49% compared to Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD) at 0.00%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTZBRKDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.49%

0.00%

+37.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

125.82%

9.21%

+116.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.34%

13.36%

+126.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

170.37%

17.26%

+153.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

170.37%

17.26%

+153.11%

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTZ vs. BRKD - Dividend Comparison

MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSTZ and BRKD have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.49%) compared to BRKD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.36% vs BRKD's -17.92%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 94.24% vs 7.98% for BRKD. On fees, BRKD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, BRKD has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 94.24% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRKD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

BRKD has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 1.00% for BRKD.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTZ and BRKD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer