MSTZ vs. BRKD
MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) and BRKD (Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. MSTZ is actively managed, while BRKD is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTZ returned 94.24% vs 7.98% for BRKD. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MSTZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BRKD.
Performance
MSTZ vs. BRKD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -46.88% return, which is significantly lower than BRKD's 5.90% return.
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 7.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ vs. BRKD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.88% | -38.95% | 66.96% |
BRKD Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares | 5.90% | -6.69% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTZ and BRKD is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | -0.02 |
The correlation between MSTZ and BRKD shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTZ vs. BRKD — Risk / Return Rank
MSTZ
BRKD
MSTZ vs. BRKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTZ | BRKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.60 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.00 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.86 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | 1.67 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTZ | BRKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.60 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 0.04 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
MSTZ vs. BRKD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than BRKD's maximum drawdown of -17.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and BRKD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTZ | BRKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | -17.92% | -81.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -9.34% | -75.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | -3.69% | -94.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -7.74% | -86.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.30% | 4.78% | +35.52% |
Volatility
MSTZ vs. BRKD - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 37.49% compared to Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares (BRKD) at 0.00%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTZ | BRKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.49% | 0.00% | +37.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 125.82% | 9.21% | +116.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.34% | 13.36% | +126.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 17.26% | +153.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 17.26% | +153.11% |
MSTZ vs. BRKD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTZ vs. BRKD - Dividend Comparison
MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRKD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRKD Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares | 2.82% | 3.50% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTZ and BRKD have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.49%) compared to BRKD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.36% vs BRKD's -17.92%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 94.24% vs 7.98% for BRKD. On fees, BRKD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, BRKD has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 94.24% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BRKD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
BRKD has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 1.00% for BRKD.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTZ and BRKD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer