MSTW vs. MAGX
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTW returned -83.12% vs 22.80% for MAGX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MAGX.
Performance
MSTW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -49.11% return, which is significantly lower than MAGX's -7.36% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -5.03%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- 6M
- -47.69%
- YTD
- -49.11%
- 1Y
- -83.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -84.93%
MAGX
- 1D
- 6.55%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.90M | $4.02M | $4.88M | |
| $1.36M | $1.35M | $3.08M |
MSTW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -49.11% | -71.40% |
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | -7.36% | 27.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and MAGX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
MAGX
MSTW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.09 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 0.40 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 1.07 | -2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, which is greater than MAGX's maximum drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and MAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -54.19% | -33.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.75% | -37.24% | -49.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.46% | -15.56% | -69.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -13.92% | -44.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 63.15% | 13.84% | +49.31% |
Volatility
MSTW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) has a higher volatility of 21.78% compared to Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) at 16.11%. This indicates that MSTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.78% | 16.11% | +5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.44% | 35.09% | +38.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.22% | 44.76% | +46.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.37% | 53.84% | +36.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.37% | 53.84% | +36.53% |
MSTW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 422.50%, more than MAGX's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.21% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 422.50% | 106.94% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and MAGX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTW has higher volatility (21.78%) compared to MAGX (16.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTW dropped -87.29% vs MAGX's -54.19%.
On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 22.80% vs -83.12% for MSTW. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGX has been the lower-risk option at 16.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 22.80% return vs -83.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 422.50%, compared with 2.21% for MAGX.
MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.95% for MAGX.
MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and MAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer