MSTW vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTW returned -83.12% vs 209.29% for AMDW. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

MSTW vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -49.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.

MSTW

• 1D: -5.03%
• 1M: -9.33%
• 6M: -47.69%
• YTD: -49.11%
• 1Y: -83.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -84.93%

AMDW

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -10.13%
• 6M: 119.90%
• YTD: 146.74%
• 1Y: 209.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 229.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.26M	$9.58M	$8.51M
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$1.36M	$1.35M	$3.08M

MSTW vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-49.11%	-71.40%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	146.74%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTW and AMDW is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

MSTW vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTW

MSTW Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTW Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MSTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTW vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTW	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	2.36	-3.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.27	2.92	-5.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.36	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	5.83	-6.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	11.47	-12.82

MSTW vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTW and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTW vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTW	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.29%	-34.64%	-52.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.75%	-34.64%	-52.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.46%	-21.39%	-64.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.78%	-13.97%	-44.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	63.15%	17.59%	+45.56%

Volatility

MSTW vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) is 21.78%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that MSTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTW	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.78%	28.87%	-7.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	73.44%	67.40%	+6.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.22%	85.70%	+5.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.37%	85.05%	+5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.37%	85.05%	+5.32%

MSTW vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSTW and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

MSTW vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 422.50%, more than AMDW's 53.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	53.42%	34.78%
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	422.50%	106.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTW and AMDW in my portfolio?

MSTW and AMDW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTW or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to MSTW (21.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTW dropped -87.29% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, MSTW or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 209.29% vs -83.12% for MSTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSTW has been the lower-risk option at 21.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTW or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 209.29% return vs -83.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTW or AMDW?

MSTW and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTW or AMDW?

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 422.50%, compared with 53.42% for AMDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.