PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTW vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTW vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -16.42% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 178.71% return.


MSTW

1D
-10.09%
1M
-27.42%
YTD
-16.42%
6M
-33.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
2.47%
1M
54.23%
YTD
178.71%
6M
175.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTW vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSTW
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF
-16.42%-71.42%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
178.71%34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTW and AMDW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTW vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTW vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTWAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.92

4.54

-5.46

Drawdowns

MSTW vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTWAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.85%

-34.64%

-47.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.11%

0.00%

-76.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.38%

-14.72%

-39.66%

Volatility

MSTW vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTWAMDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.79%

81.62%

+7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.79%

81.62%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.79%

81.62%

+7.17%

MSTW vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSTW and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

MSTW vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.17%, more than AMDW's 30.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
30.41%34.78%
MSTW
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF
219.17%106.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTW and AMDW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSTW and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 219.17%, compared with 30.41% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTW and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer