MSTW vs. AMDW
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTW vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -16.42% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 178.71% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -10.09%
- 1M
- -27.42%
- YTD
- -16.42%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 54.23%
- YTD
- 178.71%
- 6M
- 175.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTW vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -16.42% | -71.42% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 178.71% | 34.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and AMDW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTW | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.92 | 4.54 | -5.46 |
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -34.64% | -47.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | 0.00% | -76.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.38% | -14.72% | -39.66% |
Volatility
MSTW vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.79% | 81.62% | +7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 81.62% | +7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 81.62% | +7.17% |
MSTW vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTW and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSTW vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.17%, more than AMDW's 30.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 30.41% | 34.78% |
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 219.17% | 106.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and AMDW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTW and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 219.17%, compared with 30.41% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer