MSTU vs. MSII
MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSII.
Performance
MSTU vs. MSII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly lower than MSII's -21.10% return.
MSTU
- 1D
- -14.03%
- 1M
- -55.66%
- YTD
- -54.27%
- 6M
- -71.83%
- 1Y
- -95.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSII
- 1D
- -8.30%
- 1M
- -32.66%
- YTD
- -21.10%
- 6M
- -34.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU vs. MSII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -54.27% | -89.35% |
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | -21.10% | -60.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTU and MSII is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTU vs. MSII — Risk / Return Rank
MSTU
MSII
MSTU vs. MSII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | -0.97 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
MSTU vs. MSII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than MSII's maximum drawdown of -78.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and MSII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -78.73% | -19.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.52% | -74.38% | -24.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.94% | -46.16% | -25.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.17% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTU vs. MSII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTU | MSII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 111.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.62% | 71.20% | +67.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 71.20% | +97.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 71.20% | +97.86% |
MSTU vs. MSII - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MSII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTU vs. MSII - Dividend Comparison
MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | 90.41% | 48.93% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MSTU and MSII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.
MSII has the higher dividend yield at 90.41%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 0.99% for MSII.
Find the right allocation for MSTU and MSII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer