PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTU vs. CRCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTU vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -88.01% return.


MSTU

1D
-14.03%
1M
-55.66%
YTD
-54.27%
6M
-71.83%
1Y
-95.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRCD

1D
20.12%
1M
35.97%
YTD
-88.01%
6M
-87.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTU vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-54.27%-80.72%
CRCD
T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF
-88.01%43.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTU and CRCD is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025

-0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTU vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CRCD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTU vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTUCRCDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

MSTU vs. CRCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTUCRCDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

-0.45

+0.05

Drawdowns

MSTU vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and CRCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTUCRCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.58%

-96.95%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.52%

-94.31%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.94%

-54.51%

-17.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.17%

Volatility

MSTU vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTUCRCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

111.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.62%

204.54%

-65.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

169.06%

204.54%

-35.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

169.06%

204.54%

-35.48%

MSTU vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTU vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTU nor CRCD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTU and CRCD have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

MSTU and CRCD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MSTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 1.50% for CRCD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTU and CRCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer