MSTU vs. CRCD
MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
MSTU vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -88.01% return.
MSTU
- 1D
- -14.03%
- 1M
- -55.66%
- YTD
- -54.27%
- 6M
- -71.83%
- 1Y
- -95.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD
- 1D
- 20.12%
- 1M
- 35.97%
- YTD
- -88.01%
- 6M
- -87.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -54.27% | -80.72% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -88.01% | 43.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTU and CRCD is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTU vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
MSTU
CRCD
MSTU vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTU | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTU | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | -0.45 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
MSTU vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTU | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -96.95% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.52% | -94.31% | -4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.94% | -54.51% | -17.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.17% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTU vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTU | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 111.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.62% | 204.54% | -65.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 204.54% | -35.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 204.54% | -35.48% |
MSTU vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTU vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTU nor CRCD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTU and CRCD have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
MSTU and CRCD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MSTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for MSTU and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer