MSTU vs. COTG
MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
MSTU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -78.22% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 12.95% return.
MSTU
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -15.81%
- 6M
- -72.32%
- YTD
- -78.22%
- 1Y
- -97.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -75.33%
COTG
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $660.67K | $1.03M | $1.54M | |
| $200.96M | $178.85M | $198.52M |
MSTU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -78.22% | -83.45% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 12.95% | -22.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTU and COTG is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTU vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
MSTU
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -99.43%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.43% | -32.16% | -67.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.29% | -26.33% | -72.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.16% | -12.04% | -62.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 80.83% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTU vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTU | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 119.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.80% | 40.89% | +106.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.37% | 40.89% | +127.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 168.37% | 40.89% | +127.48% |
MSTU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTU and COTG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.
MSTU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for MSTU and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer