MSTU vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

MSTU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.

MSTU

• 1D: -14.03%
• 1M: -55.66%
• YTD: -54.27%
• 6M: -71.83%
• 1Y: -95.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COTG

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -11.21%
• YTD: 17.32%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	-54.27%	-85.11%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	17.32%	-21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTU and COTG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

MSTU vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTU

MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTU	COTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTU	COTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	-0.28	-0.12

Drawdowns

MSTU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTU	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.58%	-25.69%	-72.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.52%	-23.48%	-75.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.94%	-8.35%	-63.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	75.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTU	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	111.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.62%	40.65%	+97.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	169.06%	40.65%	+128.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	169.06%	40.65%	+128.41%

MSTU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTU and COTG in my portfolio?

MSTU and COTG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSTU or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTU or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTU or COTG?

MSTU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MSTU and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 0.75% for COTG.