PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. OMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSTR vs. OMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -39.01% return, which is significantly lower than OMF's -4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTR has underperformed OMF with an annualized return of 18.32%, while OMF has yielded a comparatively higher 19.71% annualized return.


MSTR

1D
12.60%
1M
-41.74%
YTD
-39.01%
6M
-40.36%
1Y
-75.86%
3Y*
39.36%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
18.32%

OMF

1D
3.16%
1M
12.73%
YTD
-4.17%
6M
-5.66%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
19.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. OMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-39.01%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
-4.17%39.77%15.14%63.03%-27.20%23.56%34.53%88.37%-6.54%17.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and OMF is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2015

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSTR:

$30.95B

OMF:

$7.31B

EPS

MSTR:

-$39.78

OMF:

$6.73

PS Ratio

MSTR:

58.70

OMF:

1.49

PB Ratio

MSTR:

0.84

OMF:

2.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSTR:

$490.47M

OMF:

$4.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSTR:

$334.08M

OMF:

$2.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSTR:

$466.93M

OMF:

$943.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. OMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

OMF
OMF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. OMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTROMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.13

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

0.63

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

1.37

-2.74

MSTR vs. OMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the OMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and OMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. OMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than OMF's maximum drawdown of -68.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and OMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTROMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-68.66%

-31.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.95%

-29.68%

-52.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.63%

-29.94%

-52.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-47.93%

-36.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-68.66%

-20.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.44%

-9.30%

-71.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.44%

-24.25%

-62.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.19%

13.57%

+41.62%

Volatility

MSTR vs. OMF - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a higher volatility of 28.41% compared to OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) at 8.55%. This indicates that MSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTROMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.41%

8.55%

+19.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.21%

21.59%

+38.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.35%

29.08%

+45.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.65%

35.59%

+55.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.13%

45.86%

+28.27%

Dividends

MSTR vs. OMF - Dividend Comparison

MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
6.72%6.17%7.90%8.13%11.41%19.08%12.33%7.12%

Financials

MSTR vs. OMF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategy Inc and OneMain Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
124.30M
197.00M
(MSTR) Total Revenue
(OMF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and OMF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to OMF (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTR dropped -99.86% vs OMF's -68.66%.

OMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and OMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer