MSTQX vs. GTLOX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSTQX (Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund) and GTLOX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTQX returned 5.69%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for GTLOX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTQX achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.30% return.

MSTQX

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: -11.30%
• 1Y: -2.27%
• 3Y*: 10.11%
• 5Y*: 5.69%
• 10Y*: —

GTLOX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 7.64%
• YTD: 22.30%
• 6M: 24.43%
• 1Y: 41.73%
• 3Y*: 21.03%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: 12.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund	5.36%	-5.56%	18.94%	25.24%	-16.29%	26.15%	10.49%	26.02%	-10.45%
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	22.30%	14.39%	13.86%	16.66%	-15.37%	27.05%	7.41%	23.27%	-9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTQX and GTLOX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between MSTQX and GTLOX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MSTQX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTQX

MSTQX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MSTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MSTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MSTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GTLOX

GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 90
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTQX	GTLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	3.06	-3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	4.18	-4.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.53	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	5.68	-5.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.25	24.44	-24.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTQX Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTQX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTQX	GTLOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	3.06	-3.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.51	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.50	-0.04

Drawdowns

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTQX drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, smaller than the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQX and GTLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTQX	GTLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.23%	-54.09%	+17.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.58%	-7.47%	-14.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.58%	-32.85%	+11.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.61%	-32.85%	+9.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.16%	-0.12%	-12.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-8.33%	+2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.57%	1.73%	+7.84%

Volatility

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) is 2.62%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that MSTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTQX	GTLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	4.27%	-1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.33%	10.35%	+7.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.09%	13.88%	+6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	21.86%	-3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	20.91%	-0.20%

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSTQX and GTLOX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

MSTQX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

MSTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GTLOX's 14.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	14.64%	17.84%	25.96%	8.32%	23.58%	13.35%	9.06%	5.35%	10.53%	4.99%	1.08%	2.09%
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund	0.65%	0.69%	10.80%	4.21%	9.79%	15.98%	2.15%	2.04%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTQX and GTLOX in my portfolio?

MSTQX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTQX or GTLOX?

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to MSTQX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQX dropped -36.23% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.