MSTQX vs. ICVT
MSTQX (Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund) and ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) are both funds - MSTQX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Morningstar, while ICVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. Over the past 5 years, MSTQX returned 6.21%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for ICVT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSTQX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ICVT.
Performance
MSTQX vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTQX achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 26.89% return.
MSTQX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- -2.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- —
ICVT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 26.89%
- 6M
- 24.71%
- 1Y
- 43.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
MSTQX vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 5.02% | -5.56% | 18.94% | 25.24% | -16.29% | 26.15% | 10.49% | 26.02% | -10.45% |
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 26.89% | 18.10% | 10.61% | 15.35% | -20.66% | -0.66% | 61.01% | 21.76% | -4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTQX and ICVT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between MSTQX and ICVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTQX vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank
MSTQX
ICVT
MSTQX vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTQX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.50 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 5.78 | -5.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 19.71 | -19.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTQX vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTQX drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, which is greater than ICVT's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQX and ICVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTQX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.23% | -33.25% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.58% | -7.55% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.58% | -11.22% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -29.95% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.44% | 0.00% | -12.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -9.46% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 2.21% | +7.52% |
Volatility
MSTQX vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) is 3.98%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that MSTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTQX | ICVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 6.96% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.44% | 12.95% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 15.57% | +4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 13.49% | +5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 15.61% | +5.07% |
MSTQX vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTQX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTQX vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison
MSTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than ICVT's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.28% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 0.65% | 0.69% | 10.80% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 15.98% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTQX and ICVT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICVT has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to MSTQX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQX dropped -36.23% vs ICVT's -33.25%.
ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTQX and ICVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer