MSTP vs. XTJL
MSTP (GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTP returned -97.00% vs 14.52% for XTJL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
MSTP vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -75.04% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.60% return.
MSTP
- 1D
- -18.67%
- 1M
- -67.93%
- YTD
- -75.04%
- 6M
- -77.32%
- 1Y
- -97.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 14.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTP vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF | -75.04% | -89.07% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.60% | 8.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTP and XTJL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTP vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
MSTP
XTJL
MSTP vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.44 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.85 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 16.13 | -17.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTP vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.87% | -23.24% | -74.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.87% | -5.12% | -92.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.87% | -0.06% | -97.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.83% | -3.99% | -65.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 77.68% | 0.90% | +76.78% |
Volatility
MSTP vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) has a higher volatility of 46.96% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.35%. This indicates that MSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.96% | 0.35% | +46.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 116.92% | 5.63% | +111.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.04% | 7.35% | +137.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.60% | 15.13% | +127.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.60% | 15.13% | +127.47% |
MSTP vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTP vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTP nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTP and XTJL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTP has higher volatility (46.96%) compared to XTJL (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTP dropped -97.87% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.52% vs -97.00% for MSTP. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.52% return vs -97.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.
MSTP and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSTP and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTP and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer