MSTP vs. XTJL
MSTP (GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTP returned -97.82% vs 13.87% for XTJL. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
MSTP vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -74.79% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 6.07% return.
MSTP
- 1D
- 11.40%
- 1M
- -43.12%
- 6M
- -80.15%
- YTD
- -74.79%
- 1Y
- -97.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MSTP vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF | -74.79% | -89.07% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.07% | 8.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTP and XTJL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTP vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
MSTP
XTJL
MSTP vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.41 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.72 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 15.40 | -16.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTP vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.40% | -23.24% | -75.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.40% | -5.12% | -93.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.85% | -0.28% | -97.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.17% | -3.96% | -67.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 80.80% | 0.90% | +79.90% |
Volatility
MSTP vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) has a higher volatility of 53.99% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 1.27%. This indicates that MSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTP | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.99% | 1.27% | +52.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 122.47% | 5.71% | +116.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.74% | 7.39% | +141.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.44% | 15.10% | +130.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.44% | 15.06% | +130.38% |
MSTP vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTP vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTP nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTP and XTJL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTP has higher volatility (53.99%) compared to XTJL (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTP dropped -98.40% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 13.87% vs -97.82% for MSTP. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 13.87% return vs -97.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.
MSTP and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSTP and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTP and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer