MSTP vs. FAAR
MSTP (GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MSTP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
MSTP vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -50.53% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 25.13% return.
MSTP
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -55.03%
- YTD
- -50.53%
- 6M
- -68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 25.13%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
MSTP vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF | -50.53% | -88.99% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.13% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTP and FAAR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTP vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
MSTP
FAAR
MSTP vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTP | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.44 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
MSTP vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTP | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.25% | -18.03% | -78.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.78% | -1.57% | -94.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.67% | -7.84% | -60.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
MSTP vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTP | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 141.25% | 13.49% | +127.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 141.25% | 13.01% | +128.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.25% | 11.51% | +129.74% |
MSTP vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTP vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
MSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.20% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTP and FAAR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FAAR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAAR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 0.00% for MSTP.
MSTP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSTP and 0.95% for FAAR.
Find the right allocation for MSTP and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer