MSTP vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

MSTP (GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. MSTP is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTP returned -97.82% vs 31.88% for EINC. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. MSTP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

MSTP vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -74.79% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 29.47% return.

MSTP

• 1D: 11.40%
• 1M: -43.12%
• 6M: -80.15%
• YTD: -74.79%
• 1Y: -97.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 2.44%
• 6M: 29.19%
• YTD: 29.47%
• 1Y: 31.88%
• 3Y*: 28.91%
• 5Y*: 22.84%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTP vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	-74.79%	-89.07%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	29.47%	2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTP and EINC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

MSTP vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTP

MSTP Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTP Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MSTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 80
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTP vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTP	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	2.08	-2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.52	2.83	-5.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.37	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	4.06	-5.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	9.98	-11.19

MSTP vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTP Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTP and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTP vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than EINC's maximum drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTP	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.40%	-87.55%	-10.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.40%	-7.89%	-90.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.85%	-1.85%	-96.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.17%	-44.00%	-27.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	80.80%	3.20%	+77.60%

Volatility

MSTP vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) has a higher volatility of 53.99% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.02%. This indicates that MSTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTP	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.99%	6.02%	+47.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	122.47%	12.31%	+110.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	148.74%	15.40%	+133.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.44%	19.57%	+125.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.44%	25.34%	+120.10%

MSTP vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTP vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

MSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.42%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
MSTP GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTP and EINC in my portfolio?

MSTP and EINC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTP or EINC?

MSTP has higher volatility (53.99%) compared to EINC (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTP dropped -98.40% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, MSTP or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 31.88% vs -97.82% for MSTP. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTP or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 31.88% return vs -97.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTP or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTP or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for MSTP.

What is the main difference between MSTP and EINC?

MSTP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSTP and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.