PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTP vs. COIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTP vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTP achieves a -52.13% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.85% return.


MSTP

1D
-13.74%
1M
-54.90%
YTD
-52.13%
6M
-70.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COIG

1D
-11.21%
1M
-37.91%
YTD
-61.85%
6M
-75.19%
1Y
-79.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTP vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSTP
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF
-52.13%-88.99%
COIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF
-61.85%-43.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTP and COIG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTP vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTP

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTP vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTP vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTPCOIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

-0.40

-0.27

Drawdowns

MSTP vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTP drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, roughly equal to the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTP and COIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTPCOIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-92.06%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.92%

-91.42%

-4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.56%

-51.70%

-16.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.88%

Volatility

MSTP vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTPCOIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.47%

139.35%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.47%

146.45%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.47%

146.45%

-4.98%

MSTP vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTP vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTP nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTP and COIG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSTP.

MSTP and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSTP and 0.75% for COIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTP and COIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer