PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTE.TO achieves a -16.99% return, which is significantly lower than HUTL.TO's 10.98% return.


MSTE.TO

1D
-1.59%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-16.99%
6M
-67.61%
1Y
-63.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUTL.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
10.98%
6M
12.13%
1Y
18.32%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTE.TO
MSTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

HUTL.TO
HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.79

1.35

-2.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.24

1.86

-3.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.29

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

2.62

-3.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.34

11.27

-12.60

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTE.TO and HUTL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

1.35

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

0.51

-1.22

Correlation

The correlation between MSTE.TO and HUTL.TO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Dividend Comparison

MSTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 165.16%, more than HUTL.TO's 7.42% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
MSTE.TO
Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
165.16%121.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF
7.42%7.94%8.30%8.56%8.13%7.16%7.73%5.33%

Drawdowns

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.35%, which is greater than HUTL.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTE.TO and HUTL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.35%

-34.00%

-46.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.35%

-7.17%

-73.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.21%

-1.37%

-73.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-6.80%

-28.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.92%

1.68%

+44.24%

Volatility

MSTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.71% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) at 3.50%. This indicates that MSTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MSTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.71%

3.50%

+15.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.62%

6.72%

+56.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.64%

13.63%

+68.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.48%

12.83%

+72.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.48%

15.28%

+70.20%