MSTB vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSTB (LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTB is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the S&P 500® Index, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. MSTB is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MSTB charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

MSTB vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSTB

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 8.71%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 20.33%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTB vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	0.49%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTB and BPH is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.03

MSTB vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSTB	BPH
Technology	36.1%	-
Financial Services	11.9%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	100.0%
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

MSTB vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTB

MSTB Risk / Return Rank: 56
MSTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MSTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MSTB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MSTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MSTB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTB vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTB	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTB	BPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	9.48	-8.65

Drawdowns

MSTB vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTB	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-2.35%	-23.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	0.00%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-1.08%	-6.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTB	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.21%	25.75%	-15.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	25.75%	-11.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	25.75%	-11.91%

MSTB vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTB vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.95%	0.16%	1.34%	2.20%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTB and BPH in my portfolio?

MSTB and BPH have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSTB or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTB or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for MSTB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTB or BPH?

MSTB has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

What is the main difference between MSTB and BPH?

MSTB is categorized as Equity Hedged, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for MSTB and 0.19% for BPH.