MST vs. AIPO
MST (Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. MST is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MST charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
MST vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MST achieves a -46.90% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.
MST
- 1D
- -14.62%
- 1M
- -51.85%
- YTD
- -46.90%
- 6M
- -62.90%
- 1Y
- -92.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 52.03%
- 6M
- 45.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MST vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | -46.90% | -86.75% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 52.03% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MST and AIPO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MST vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
MST
AIPO
MST vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MST | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MST | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.74 | 2.36 | -3.10 |
Drawdowns
MST vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MST drawdown since its inception was -94.99%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MST and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MST | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.99% | -17.31% | -77.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.34% | -1.12% | -93.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.22% | -4.38% | -57.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MST vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MST | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 126.60% | 34.09% | +92.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.87% | 34.09% | +89.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.87% | 34.09% | +89.78% |
MST vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MST has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
MST vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
MST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 891.75%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | 891.75% | 381.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MST and AIPO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.
MST has the higher dividend yield at 891.75%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
MST is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIPO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MST and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for MST and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer