MSST vs. AMDW
MSST (YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSST vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -33.85% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 174.56% return.
MSST
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -25.86%
- 6M
- -33.85%
- YTD
- -33.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -5.13%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- 174.56%
- YTD
- 174.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSST vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -33.85% | -24.58% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 174.56% | -13.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSST and AMDW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSST vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSST vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSST | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -34.64% | -24.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.11% | -12.53% | -37.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -14.01% | -11.54% |
Volatility
MSST vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSST | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.61% | 83.51% | -7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 83.51% | -7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 83.51% | -7.90% |
MSST vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSST and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSST vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.05%, less than AMDW's 39.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 39.85% | 34.78% |
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 24.05% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSST and AMDW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSST and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 39.85%, compared with 24.05% for MSST.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for MSST and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer