PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSPIX vs. MUBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay S&P 500 Index Fund (MSPIX) and MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSPIX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than MUBFX's 7.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MSPIX has outperformed MUBFX with an annualized return of 15.38%, while MUBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.94% annualized return.


MSPIX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.58%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
15.38%

MUBFX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.64%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.78%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSPIX
MainStay S&P 500 Index Fund
11.58%17.55%24.31%26.29%-18.33%28.46%18.14%31.02%-4.47%21.38%
MUBFX
MainStay WMC Value Fund
7.80%14.74%10.72%9.62%-4.54%28.60%13.62%31.67%-6.89%22.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MSPIX and MUBFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1991

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between MSPIX and MUBFX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSPIX vs. MUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSPIX
MSPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MSPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MSPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MUBFX
MUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay S&P 500 Index Fund (MSPIX) and MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSPIXMUBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.02

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.40

2.85

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.36

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.20

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.46

12.19

+3.27

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the MUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSPIX and MUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSPIXMUBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.02

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.63

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.73

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.64

-0.03

Drawdowns

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSPIX drawdown since its inception was -55.30%, roughly equal to the maximum MUBFX drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSPIX and MUBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSPIXMUBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.30%

-53.31%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-6.67%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-14.19%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.64%

-15.61%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

-39.31%

+5.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-6.17%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.75%

+0.16%

Volatility

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay S&P 500 Index Fund (MSPIX) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) at 2.20%. This indicates that MSPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSPIXMUBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.20%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

7.72%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

10.60%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

14.80%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.91%

+0.17%

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSPIX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MUBFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSPIX vs. MUBFX - Dividend Comparison

MSPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than MUBFX's 6.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSPIX
MainStay S&P 500 Index Fund
1.12%1.25%5.31%4.17%10.37%4.57%8.86%17.41%14.61%15.26%9.79%5.75%
MUBFX
MainStay WMC Value Fund
6.85%7.38%5.24%4.49%5.82%81.14%3.79%8.43%11.90%11.15%2.53%19.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSPIX and MUBFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSPIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to MUBFX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSPIX dropped -55.30% vs MUBFX's -53.31%.

MSPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSPIX and MUBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer