PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOX vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -21.43% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.38% return.


MSOX

1D
15.03%
1M
-3.56%
YTD
-21.43%
6M
-17.37%
1Y
26.62%
3Y*
-61.23%
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.01%
YTD
5.38%
6M
6.35%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSOX
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF
-21.43%-51.20%-87.32%-39.26%-79.25%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.38%15.42%14.43%25.72%-2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and XTJL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022

0.24

MSOX vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSOX
XTJL

Financial Services

179.4%
11.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

36.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

MSOX
179.4%
XTJL
11.9%

Basic Materials

MSOX

-

XTJL
1.8%

Communication Services

MSOX

-

XTJL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MSOX

-

XTJL
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

MSOX

-

XTJL
4.9%

Energy

MSOX

-

XTJL
3.5%

Healthcare

MSOX

-

XTJL
8.4%

Industrials

MSOX

-

XTJL
8.1%

Real Estate

MSOX

-

XTJL
1.9%

Technology

MSOX

-

XTJL
36.2%

Utilities

MSOX

-

XTJL
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX
MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSOXXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

3.06

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.48

17.30

-16.82

MSOX vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOXXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

2.11

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.65

-1.09

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOXXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.75%

-23.24%

-76.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-5.12%

-79.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.83%

-16.70%

-82.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.48%

0.00%

-99.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.86%

-4.04%

-84.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.18%

0.90%

+54.28%

Volatility

MSOX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 43.16% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOXXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.16%

0.31%

+42.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

155.70%

5.72%

+149.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

219.41%

7.42%

+211.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.43%

15.21%

+153.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.43%

15.21%

+153.22%

MSOX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSOX nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSOX and XTJL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSOX has higher volatility (43.16%) compared to XTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 3-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.67% vs -61.23% for MSOX. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.67% return vs -61.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.

MSOX and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOX and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer