PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOX vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSOX vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MSOX vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSOX
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF
-52.01%-51.20%0.88%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
-17.87%32.45%-0.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -52.01% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's -17.87% return.


MSOX

1D
25.00%
1M
-21.82%
YTD
-52.01%
6M
-72.26%
1Y
-45.71%
3Y*
-69.45%
5Y*
10Y*

NVDG

1D
11.02%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
-17.87%
6M
-22.83%
1Y
93.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSOX vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MSOX vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX
MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSOXNVDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

1.15

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.91

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

2.11

-2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

5.07

-5.99

MSOX vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and NVDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOXNVDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

1.15

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

0.07

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and NVDG is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MSOX vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.38%.


Drawdowns

MSOX vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and NVDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOXNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.75%

-66.19%

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-42.72%

-42.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.68%

-36.40%

-63.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.32%

-24.00%

-64.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.00%

17.77%

+32.23%

Volatility

MSOX vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 44.06% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) at 20.82%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MSOXNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.06%

20.82%

+23.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

154.20%

51.08%

+103.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

213.51%

81.33%

+132.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

167.02%

92.52%

+74.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

167.02%

92.52%

+74.50%