MSOX vs. NRGU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).

MSOX and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSOX is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Aug 23, 2022. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019.

Performance

MSOX vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSOX vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	-52.01%	-33.43%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	168.34%	-33.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -52.01% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 168.34% return.

MSOX

• 1D: 25.00%
• 1M: -21.82%
• YTD: -52.01%
• 6M: -72.26%
• 1Y: -45.71%
• 3Y*: -69.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -5.28%
• 1M: 54.17%
• YTD: 168.34%
• 6M: 128.96%
• 1Y: 92.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSOX and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

MSOX

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF

NRGU

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

MSOX vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX

MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 19
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 63
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSOX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	1.06	-1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	1.70	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.25	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	1.79	-2.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.91	3.65	-4.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSOX vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSOX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	1.06	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.47	0.81	-1.28

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and NRGU is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MSOX vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSOX nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOX	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.75%	-57.50%	-42.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.89%	-55.24%	-29.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.68%	-7.45%	-92.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.32%	-25.41%	-62.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.00%	27.10%	+22.90%

Volatility

MSOX vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 44.06% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 19.53%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSOX	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.06%	19.53%	+24.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	154.20%	48.98%	+105.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	213.51%	87.53%	+125.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	167.02%	86.64%	+80.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	167.02%	86.64%	+80.38%