MSOX vs. MUU
MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MSOX is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
MSOX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSOX
- 1D
- -8.53%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -40.18%
- 6M
- -40.18%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- -65.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSOX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -17.79% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOX and MUU is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
MSOX
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSOX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.75% | -26.28% | -73.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.60% | -26.28% | -73.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.90% | -10.19% | -78.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.15% | — | — |
Volatility
MSOX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 113.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 220.65% | 295.32% | -74.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.09% | 295.32% | -127.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 168.09% | 295.32% | -127.23% |
MSOX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSOX nor MUU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOX and MUU have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
MSOX and MUU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for MSOX and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer