MSOX vs. DWSH
MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSOX returned -66.53%/yr vs -3.38%/yr for DWSH. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for DWSH.
Performance
MSOX vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -37.05% return, which is significantly lower than DWSH's -5.73% return.
MSOX
- 1D
- 9.30%
- 1M
- -17.54%
- 6M
- -43.26%
- YTD
- -37.05%
- 1Y
- -29.50%
- 3Y*
- -66.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 1Y
- -6.96%
- 3Y*
- -3.38%
- 5Y*
- -2.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MSOX vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -37.05% | -51.20% | -87.32% | -39.26% | -76.29% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | -5.73% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 7.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOX and DWSH is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022 | -0.26 |
MSOX vs. DWSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSOX
DWSH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
MSOX
DWSH
Basic Materials
MSOX
-
DWSH
Communication Services
MSOX
-
DWSH
Consumer Cyclical
MSOX
-
DWSH
Consumer Defensive
MSOX
-
DWSH
Energy
MSOX
-
DWSH
Healthcare
MSOX
-
DWSH
Industrials
MSOX
-
DWSH
Real Estate
MSOX
-
DWSH
Technology
MSOX
-
DWSH
Utilities
MSOX
-
DWSH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOX vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank
MSOX
DWSH
MSOX vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOX | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.96 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | -0.37 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | -0.82 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOX vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than DWSH's maximum drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and DWSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOX | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.75% | -83.55% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -18.88% | -66.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.83% | -32.61% | -66.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.58% | -82.48% | -17.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.04% | -63.81% | -25.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.62% | 8.46% | +51.16% |
Volatility
MSOX vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 33.52% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) at 10.81%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOX | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.52% | 10.81% | +22.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 112.31% | 16.82% | +95.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 220.61% | 22.28% | +198.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.49% | 26.35% | +141.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.49% | 31.24% | +136.25% |
MSOX vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOX vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison
MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.69% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOX and DWSH have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOX has higher volatility (33.52%) compared to DWSH (10.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs DWSH's -83.55%.
On 3-year performance, DWSH leads with -3.38% vs -66.53% for MSOX. On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 10.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -3.38% return vs -66.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.
MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 3.67% for DWSH.
MSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSOX and DWSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer