MSOX vs. DIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MSOX is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSOX returned -63.28%/yr vs 23.37%/yr for DIG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

MSOX vs. DIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -31.70% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 66.35% return.

MSOX

• 1D: -11.82%
• 1M: -8.66%
• YTD: -31.70%
• 6M: -19.05%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: -63.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIG

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: 66.35%
• 6M: 59.45%
• 1Y: 90.00%
• 3Y*: 23.37%
• 5Y*: 28.29%
• 10Y*: 5.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	-31.70%	-51.20%	-87.32%	-39.26%	-79.25%
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas	66.35%	2.73%	0.93%	-13.04%	6.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and DIG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022	0.17

The correlation between MSOX and DIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MSOX vs. DIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSOX	DIG
Financial Services	179.4%	6.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	61.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSOX vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX

MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 19
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

DIG

DIG Risk / Return Rank: 61
DIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DIG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DIG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSOX	DIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	2.22	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.61	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	3.89	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.13	10.65	-10.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSOX vs. DIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the DIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and DIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSOX	DIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	2.22	-2.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.45	-0.00	-0.45

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, roughly equal to the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and DIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOX	DIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.75%	-97.04%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.89%	-23.29%	-61.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.83%	-42.41%	-56.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.55%	-51.27%	-48.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.85%	-64.37%	-24.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.03%	8.49%	+46.54%

Volatility

MSOX vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 41.61% compared to ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) at 16.56%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSOX	DIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.61%	16.56%	+25.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	155.35%	33.14%	+122.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.03%	40.88%	+178.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.34%	51.59%	+116.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.34%	57.81%	+110.53%

MSOX vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSOX and DIG have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

MSOX vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas	1.50%	2.62%	3.13%	0.61%	1.33%	2.24%	3.18%	2.72%	2.30%	1.76%	1.09%	1.56%
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOX and DIG in my portfolio?

MSOX and DIG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSOX or DIG?

MSOX has higher volatility (41.61%) compared to DIG (16.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs DIG's -97.04%.

Which ETF is better, MSOX or DIG?

On 3-year performance, DIG leads with 23.37% vs -63.28% for MSOX. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DIG has been the lower-risk option at 16.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSOX or DIG?

Over the 3-year period, DIG has performed better with a 23.37% return vs -63.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOX or DIG?

MSOX and DIG have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOX or DIG?

DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

What is the main difference between MSOX and DIG?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.