PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOX vs. COIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOX vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -37.05% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -67.10% return.


MSOX

1D
9.30%
1M
-17.54%
6M
-43.26%
YTD
-37.05%
1Y
-29.50%
3Y*
-66.53%
5Y*
10Y*

COIG

1D
-2.31%
1M
-7.03%
6M
-71.05%
YTD
-67.10%
1Y
-91.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSOX
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF
-37.05%8.21%
COIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF
-67.10%-10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and COIG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOX vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX
MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSOXCOIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.82

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

-0.97

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

-1.26

+0.77

MSOX vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the COIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and COIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than COIG's maximum drawdown of -93.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and COIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOXCOIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.75%

-93.79%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-93.79%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.58%

-92.61%

-6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.04%

-54.71%

-34.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.62%

72.19%

-12.57%

Volatility

MSOX vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) have volatilities of 33.52% and 33.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOXCOIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.52%

33.76%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

112.31%

103.76%

+8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

220.61%

133.84%

+86.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

167.49%

144.51%

+22.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

167.49%

144.51%

+22.98%

MSOX vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOX vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSOX nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSOX and COIG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (33.76%) compared to MSOX (33.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs COIG's -93.79%.

On 1-year performance, MSOX leads with -29.50% vs -91.34% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MSOX has been the lower-risk option at 33.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSOX has performed better with a -29.50% return vs -91.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.

MSOX and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.75% for COIG.

MSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOX and COIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer