PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOX vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOX vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -31.70% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 391.03% return.


MSOX

1D
-11.82%
1M
-8.66%
YTD
-31.70%
6M
-19.05%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
-63.28%
5Y*
10Y*

AMDG

1D
7.70%
1M
134.89%
YTD
391.03%
6M
367.32%
1Y
1,172.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSOX
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF
-31.70%-41.44%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
391.03%96.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and AMDG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOX vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX
MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSOXAMDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.63

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

20.99

-20.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

41.10

-40.97

MSOX vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 9.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOXAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

9.15

-9.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

3.36

-3.81

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOXAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.75%

-63.04%

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-56.48%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.55%

0.00%

-99.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.85%

-25.70%

-63.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.03%

28.80%

+26.23%

Volatility

MSOX vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) is 41.61%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 45.35%. This indicates that MSOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOXAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.61%

45.35%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

155.35%

94.94%

+60.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

219.03%

129.64%

+89.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.34%

130.26%

+38.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.34%

130.26%

+38.08%

MSOX vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOX vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSOX and AMDG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDG has higher volatility (45.35%) compared to MSOX (41.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs AMDG's -63.04%.

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 1172.87% vs 6.99% for MSOX. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MSOX has been the lower-risk option at 41.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 1172.87% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.75% for AMDG.

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.15 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOX and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer