MSOS vs. RUSC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) and RUSC (U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSOS returned 99.16% vs 38.22% for RUSC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOS charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for RUSC.

Performance

MSOS vs. RUSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than RUSC's 18.04% return.

MSOS

• 1D: -6.14%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 28.46%
• 1Y: 99.16%
• 3Y*: -4.01%
• 5Y*: -35.03%
• 10Y*: —

RUSC

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 18.04%
• 6M: 17.30%
• 1Y: 38.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. RUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	0.42%	76.12%
RUSC U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF	18.04%	17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and RUSC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

MSOS vs. RUSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS

MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 32
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

RUSC

RUSC Risk / Return Rank: 70
RUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
RUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. RUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSOS	RUSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.12	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	3.01	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	4.18	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.58	14.94	-11.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSOS vs. RUSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the RUSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOS and RUSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSOS	RUSC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	2.12	-1.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	2.03	-2.37

Drawdowns

MSOS vs. RUSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than RUSC's maximum drawdown of -9.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and RUSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOS	RUSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	-9.18%	-87.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.91%	-9.18%	-43.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.37%	-1.27%	-90.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.71%	-1.75%	-69.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.78%	2.57%	+25.21%

Volatility

MSOS vs. RUSC - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a higher volatility of 20.45% compared to U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) at 5.36%. This indicates that MSOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSOS	RUSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.45%	5.36%	+15.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.61%	12.99%	+67.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	112.00%	18.14%	+93.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.81%	18.09%	+59.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.04%	18.09%	+55.95%

MSOS vs. RUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RUSC's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOS vs. RUSC - Dividend Comparison

MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%
RUSC U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF	0.32%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOS and RUSC in my portfolio?

MSOS and RUSC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSOS or RUSC?

MSOS has higher volatility (20.45%) compared to RUSC (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOS dropped -96.25% vs RUSC's -9.18%.

Which ETF is better, MSOS or RUSC?

On 1-year performance, MSOS leads with 99.16% vs 38.22% for RUSC. On fees, RUSC is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, RUSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSOS or RUSC?

Over the 1-year period, MSOS has performed better with a 99.16% return vs 38.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOS or RUSC?

RUSC is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MSOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOS or RUSC?

RUSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

What is the main difference between MSOS and RUSC?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 0.64% for RUSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RUSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.