PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RUSC vs. REMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RUSC vs. REMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) and Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUSC achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than REMG's 18.73% return.


RUSC

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.10%
6M
14.71%
YTD
20.77%
1Y
37.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
32.86%

REMG

1D
0.52%
1M
-2.39%
6M
9.08%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
38.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
39.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.87M$1.04M$634.75K
$288.67K$289.35K$509.97K

RUSC vs. REMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RUSC and REMG is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

0.64

The correlation between RUSC and REMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RUSC vs. REMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RUSC
RUSC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

REMG
REMG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
REMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
REMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RUSC vs. REMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) and Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RUSCREMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.61

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.21

8.17

+5.04

RUSC vs. REMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the REMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUSC and REMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RUSC vs. REMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUSC drawdown since its inception was -9.18%, smaller than the maximum REMG drawdown of -14.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSC and REMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RUSCREMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-14.13%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-14.13%

+4.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-9.49%

+5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-2.58%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

4.51%

-1.87%

Volatility

RUSC vs. REMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) is 4.10%, while Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that RUSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RUSCREMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

8.99%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

22.40%

-8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

24.69%

-6.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

23.31%

-5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

23.31%

-5.35%

RUSC vs. REMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RUSC and REMG have an expense ratio of 0.64%.


Dividends

RUSC vs. REMG - Dividend Comparison

RUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than REMG's 1.16% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RUSC and REMG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMG has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to RUSC (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUSC dropped -9.18% vs REMG's -14.13%.

On 1-year performance, REMG leads with 38.10% vs 37.10% for RUSC. Both ETFs have the same 0.64% expense ratio. On volatility, RUSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, REMG has performed better with a 38.10% return vs 37.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RUSC and REMG have the same expense ratio: 0.64% per year.

REMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.32% for RUSC.

RUSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while REMG is Emerging Markets Equities.

RUSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RUSC and REMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer