MSOS vs. EATZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOS charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

MSOS vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSOS

• 1D: 4.68%
• 1M: -6.75%
• 6M: -6.37%
• YTD: -0.42%
• 1Y: 59.32%
• 3Y*: -7.82%
• 5Y*: -34.43%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	-0.42%	23.88%	-45.65%	0.29%	-72.68%	-32.78%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and EATZ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.27

MSOS vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSOS	EATZ
Real Estate	50.2%	-
Industrials	29.6%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	17.8%	78.2%
Healthcare	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	16.9%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSOS vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS

MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 29
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 22

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSOS	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.05	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOS	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.44%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.04%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSOS	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	112.70%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.34%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.87%	—	—

MSOS vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOS vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOS and EATZ in my portfolio?

MSOS and EATZ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSOS or EATZ?

On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOS or EATZ?

MSOS is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOS or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

What is the main difference between MSOS and EATZ?

MSOS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 1.00% for EATZ.