PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOO vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOO vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -23.81% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.


MSOO

1D
-6.75%
1M
-28.26%
YTD
-23.81%
6M
-38.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-2.46%
1M
14.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOO vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSOO and NVDO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOO vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSOO vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOONVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.13

1.30

-2.43

Drawdowns

MSOO vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -72.39%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOONVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.39%

-16.25%

-56.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.12%

-2.68%

-67.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.41%

-4.99%

-42.42%

Volatility

MSOO vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOONVDODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.25%

31.93%

+37.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.25%

31.93%

+37.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.25%

31.93%

+37.32%

MSOO vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOO vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than NVDO's 14.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSOO and NVDO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 2.13% for MSOO.

Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOO and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer