MSOO vs. ASMG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) and ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ASMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ASMG.

Performance

MSOO vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -22.23% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 135.99% return.

MSOO

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -28.01%
• YTD: -22.23%
• 6M: -36.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMG

• 1D: 3.70%
• 1M: 43.96%
• YTD: 135.99%
• 6M: 116.32%
• 1Y: 327.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOO vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	-22.23%	-60.78%
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	135.99%	83.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOO and ASMG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

MSOO vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG

ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOO vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSOO	ASMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.12	1.97	-3.09

Drawdowns

MSOO vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -72.39%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and ASMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOO	ASMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.39%	-43.95%	-28.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.50%	0.00%	-69.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.52%	-13.24%	-34.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	13.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSOO	ASMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	28.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	64.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.14%	81.20%	-12.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.14%	84.41%	-15.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.14%	84.41%	-15.27%

MSOO vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOO vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than ASMG's 4.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	4.75%	11.20%
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	2.09%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOO and ASMG in my portfolio?

MSOO and ASMG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSOO or ASMG?

On fees, ASMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOO or ASMG?

ASMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOO or ASMG?

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 2.09% for MSOO.

What is the main difference between MSOO and ASMG?

MSOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ASMG is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.75% for ASMG.