MSOAX vs. MLAAX
MSOAX (MainStay WMC Enduring Capital Fund) and MLAAX (MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - MSOAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by New York Life, while MLAAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by New York Life. Over the past 10 years, MSOAX returned 10.71%/yr vs 17.44%/yr for MLAAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSOAX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for MLAAX.
Performance
MSOAX vs. MLAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOAX achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than MLAAX's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MSOAX has underperformed MLAAX with an annualized return of 10.71%, while MLAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.44% annualized return.
MSOAX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
MLAAX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- 17.44%
MSOAX vs. MLAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSOAX MainStay WMC Enduring Capital Fund | 2.15% | -0.61% | 10.54% | 17.67% | -13.18% | 35.36% | 15.48% | 24.80% | -7.00% | 23.82% |
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | 5.23% | 14.20% | 28.95% | 43.10% | -31.51% | 25.00% | 36.95% | 33.18% | 3.81% | 32.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOAX and MLAAX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1998 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSOAX and MLAAX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOAX vs. MLAAX — Risk / Return Rank
MSOAX
MLAAX
MSOAX vs. MLAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Enduring Capital Fund (MSOAX) and MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOAX | MLAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 0.73 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 2.11 | -2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOAX vs. MLAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOAX drawdown since its inception was -55.16%, smaller than the maximum MLAAX drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOAX and MLAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOAX | MLAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.16% | -83.01% | +27.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -20.28% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.69% | -35.43% | +20.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -39.36% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.01% | -39.36% | +5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.31% | -4.99% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -38.75% | +25.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 6.98% | -1.34% |
Volatility
MSOAX vs. MLAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MainStay WMC Enduring Capital Fund (MSOAX) is 3.56%, while MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that MSOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOAX | MLAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 7.70% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 14.12% | -4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 17.82% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 25.75% | -9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 25.80% | -7.99% |
MSOAX vs. MLAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOAX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than MLAAX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOAX vs. MLAAX - Dividend Comparison
MSOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than MLAAX's 23.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | 23.16% | 24.37% | 22.54% | 10.59% | 14.95% | 26.64% | 5.40% | 11.55% | 23.59% | 17.20% | 13.18% | 13.61% |
MSOAX MainStay WMC Enduring Capital Fund | 3.98% | 4.07% | 0.26% | 0.64% | 4.00% | 8.70% | 0.83% | 5.99% | 13.82% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOAX and MLAAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLAAX has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to MSOAX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOAX dropped -55.16% vs MLAAX's -83.01%.
MLAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSOAX and MLAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer