PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSMLX vs. HEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSMLX achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly higher than HEFA's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MSMLX has underperformed HEFA with an annualized return of 11.73%, while HEFA has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.


MSMLX

1D
0.87%
1M
2.24%
YTD
25.47%
6M
24.22%
1Y
34.43%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
11.73%

HEFA

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.65%
YTD
10.24%
6M
12.49%
1Y
25.95%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSMLX
Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
25.47%13.50%-6.10%20.04%-16.78%26.40%43.69%17.38%-17.80%30.43%
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
10.24%24.58%13.71%20.33%-4.86%19.59%2.09%27.63%-9.33%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MSMLX and HEFA is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.54

The correlation between MSMLX and HEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSMLX vs. HEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSMLX
MSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HEFA
HEFA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSMLXHEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.74

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

11.43

-2.05

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the HEFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSMLX and HEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSMLXHEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.07

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.99

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.80

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.66

-0.01

Drawdowns

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSMLX drawdown since its inception was -36.40%, which is greater than HEFA's maximum drawdown of -32.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMLX and HEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSMLXHEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.40%

-32.39%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-9.52%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.62%

-14.28%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.00%

-14.79%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-32.39%

-1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.45%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-4.17%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

2.28%

+1.58%

Volatility

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) at 4.05%. This indicates that MSMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSMLXHEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

4.05%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

10.13%

+5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.81%

12.59%

+6.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

13.76%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

15.86%

+1.32%

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSMLX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than HEFA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSMLX vs. HEFA - Dividend Comparison

MSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than HEFA's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
3.99%4.40%3.09%3.02%25.14%3.06%2.10%7.56%4.58%2.55%3.17%3.54%
MSMLX
Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
1.19%1.50%3.95%8.36%8.04%9.18%0.28%0.51%21.31%8.12%0.43%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSMLX and HEFA have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSMLX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to HEFA (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSMLX dropped -36.40% vs HEFA's -32.39%.

HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSMLX and HEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer