MSMLX vs. GLLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).
MSMLX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Sep 14, 2008. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.
Performance
MSMLX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSMLX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | -0.43% | 13.50% | -6.10% | 20.04% | -16.78% | 26.40% | 43.69% | 17.38% | -17.80% | 30.43% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 5.47% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 23.64% | -11.50% | 23.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSMLX achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MSMLX has underperformed GLLSX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while GLLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.
MSMLX
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
GLLSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 48.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSMLX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSMLX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSMLX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank
MSMLX
GLLSX
MSMLX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSMLX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 2.46 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 3.02 | -1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.46 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 3.15 | -2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | 13.47 | -10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSMLX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.46 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.71 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.67 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSMLX and GLLSX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MSMLX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison
MSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than GLLSX's 1.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 1.50% | 1.50% | 3.95% | 8.36% | 8.04% | 9.18% | 0.28% | 0.51% | 21.31% | 8.12% | 0.43% | 0.13% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.78% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
MSMLX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSMLX drawdown since its inception was -36.40%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMLX and GLLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSMLX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.40% | -32.59% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -14.39% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.00% | -30.02% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -32.59% | -1.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.89% | -14.39% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -7.99% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 3.36% | +0.57% |
Volatility
MSMLX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) is 8.16%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that MSMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSMLX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 10.78% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 15.60% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 19.51% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 17.21% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 17.34% | -0.51% |