PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSM vs. CBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSM vs. CBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (MSM) and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSM achieves a 51.51% return, which is significantly higher than CBL's 43.80% return.


MSM

1D
0.79%
1M
7.03%
6M
52.40%
YTD
51.51%
1Y
42.37%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
10.39%

CBL

1D
-1.28%
1M
4.02%
6M
41.02%
YTD
43.80%
1Y
108.75%
3Y*
41.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSM vs. CBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSM
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
51.51%17.41%-23.40%28.52%0.90%-0.04%
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
43.80%37.21%28.52%12.96%-17.96%18.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MSM and CBL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.31

The correlation between MSM and CBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSM:

$6.92B

CBL:

$1.60B

EPS

MSM:

$4.12

CBL:

$5.56

PE Ratio

MSM:

30.08

CBL:

9.30

PEG Ratio

MSM:

12.15

CBL:

0.04

PS Ratio

MSM:

1.77

CBL:

2.75

PB Ratio

MSM:

4.89

CBL:

3.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSM:

$3.91B

CBL:

$582.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSM:

$1.60B

CBL:

$139.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSM:

$405.87M

CBL:

$413.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSM vs. CBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSM
MSM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CBL
CBL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSM vs. CBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (MSM) and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSMCBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.60

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

8.84

-5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

29.00

-19.90

MSM vs. CBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the CBL Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSM and CBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSM vs. CBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSM drawdown since its inception was -76.60%, which is greater than CBL's maximum drawdown of -34.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSM and CBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSMCBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.60%

-34.02%

-42.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-12.31%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.31%

-29.14%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.48%

+6.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.32%

-12.26%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

3.75%

+0.94%

Volatility

MSM vs. CBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (MSM) is 7.75%, while CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that MSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSMCBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

10.88%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.47%

21.42%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.69%

27.78%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.90%

32.40%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

32.40%

-5.66%

Dividends

MSM vs. CBL - Dividend Comparison

MSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than CBL's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
4.16%6.76%5.44%6.14%12.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSM
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
2.81%4.07%4.47%3.16%3.72%3.57%13.63%3.52%3.08%1.89%1.88%2.90%

Financials

MSM vs. CBL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
1.05B
145.97M
(MSM) Total Revenue
(CBL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSM vs. CBL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
41.1%
62.6%
Portfolio components
MSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 430.41M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.

CBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.34M and revenue of 145.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

MSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 106.75M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

CBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 72.75M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.8%.

MSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. reported a net income of 80.36M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

CBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 45.40M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSM and CBL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBL has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to MSM (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSM dropped -76.60% vs CBL's -34.02%.

CBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSM and CBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer