PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSLC vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSLC vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSLC achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


MSLC

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.08%
YTD
8.55%
6M
8.69%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSLC vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSLC
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF
8.55%15.68%-3.29%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%-2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MSLC and MTUM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.85

The correlation between MSLC and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSLC vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSLC
MSLC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSLC vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSLCMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.64

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

14.50

-3.74

MSLC vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSLC and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSLCMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.20

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.85

-0.02

Drawdowns

MSLC vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSLC drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSLC and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSLCMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.86%

-34.08%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-11.54%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-6.21%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.89%

-0.78%

Volatility

MSLC vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) is 2.87%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that MSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSLCMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

7.68%

-4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

16.46%

-7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

19.04%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

20.60%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

21.03%

-3.92%

MSLC vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSLC vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

MSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSLC
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF
1.98%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSLC and MTUM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to MSLC (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSLC dropped -17.86% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 41.76% vs 22.69% for MSLC. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 41.76% return vs 22.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MSLC.

MSLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

MSLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MSLC and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSLC and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer