MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO
MSHE.TO (Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and HBIX.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSHE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while HBIX.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSHE.TO returned -8.22% vs -41.89% for HBIX.NEO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HBIX.NEO.
Performance
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -28.85% return.
MSHE.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIX.NEO
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -19.49%
- YTD
- -28.85%
- 6M
- -33.69%
- 1Y
- -41.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -13.46% | 22.73% |
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | -28.85% | -6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSHE.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
MSHE.TO
HBIX.NEO
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSHE.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.87 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | -0.75 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | -1.33 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSHE.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | -0.81 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.62 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and HBIX.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSHE.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -55.90% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | -55.90% | +18.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -52.88% | +29.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -23.75% | +12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 31.57% | -13.21% |
Volatility
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) have volatilities of 11.24% and 11.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSHE.TO | HBIX.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 11.40% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 41.52% | -16.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 51.62% | -24.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 50.94% | -22.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 50.94% | -22.67% |
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSHE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison
MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, less than HBIX.NEO's 44.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | 44.52% | 20.21% | 0.00% |
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.77% | 17.17% | 5.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSHE.TO and HBIX.NEO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSHE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSHE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.
MSHE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBIX.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSHE.TO and 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.
Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and HBIX.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer